Despite the hopes of many Yankee fans, there was no surprise huge bid for Yu Darvish from the Yankee brass.  Instead, to the devastation of the Blue Jay faithful (and the cult of personality surrounding GM Alex Anthopoulos) the 25 year-old ace will be swaggering on down to Texas, assuming the Rangers can meet the demands of Darvish and agent Arn Tellem.  It is likely that the Yankees knew that they would not be the favorites to land Darvish when they submitted a lower bid, but there is no doubt that they (and other teams) were waiting for the Darvish situation to resolve itself before moving on to other matters.

Now that Darvish’s negotiating rights are in the Rangers’ possession, the Yankees can proceed with their offseason plan and look to further improve the team.  There are two main orders of business remaining as I see it: adding a mid-rotation starter, and considering whether they want to enter the bidding for Cuban OF Yoenis Cespedes.  If the Yankees had acquired Darvish, they likely wouldn’t be pursuing either of these options (with Darvish filling the starter role), but since the Yankees were not willing to spend the resources required for Darvish, they may look elsewhere.

The main question to be answered over the remainder of the offseason is whether the Yankees will be constrained in their spending this offseason, as a consequence of  their alleged goal of getting the payroll under $189 million for 2014 (the austerity plan).  Alternatively, another possibility is that the Yankees simply don’t see much value in this offseason’s free agent or trade markets, and are instead waiting to make a splash in the excellent free agent class in 2012 that could include Cole Hamels, Zack Greinke, Matt Cain, and several other solid rotation options (the “screw austerity” plan).

In either scenario, going after RHP Hiroki Kuroda makes a lot of sense for the Yankees.  He posted a 3.56 xFIP last season for the Dodgers, and is reportedly looking for a 1-year deal.  The short contract gives the Yankees a lot of flexibility to either go after a big-ticket starter next year, or else integrate one of their young pitchers into the rotation should they force the issue at the end of 2011.  In either situation, it makes no long-term commitment that would interfere with the Yankees’ ability to reduce payroll to get under the magic $189 million threshold in 2014, to greatly reduce their luxury tax and revenue sharing obligations.

The main alternative to Kuroda on the free agent market would be Edwin Jackson, who has the talent to improve the Yankee rotation.  However, his contract demands may not work for either plan.  He is unlikely to take a deal short enough to be off the books by 2014, and almost definitely won’t take a 1-year deal to leave a spot open for a 2012 signing.  He may be the best free agent option available now, but is not likely to be the best option going forward.  Roy Oswalt would likely take a shorter deal than Jackson, but the potential risks due to age and injury are substantial.  If he takes a 1-year deal though, he’ll be a comparable option to Kuroda (albeit with more injury risk)

John Danks has been discussed as a possible target due to his assumed affordability (since he has 1 year left on his deal and had a down year in 2011).  However, given the price the Reds paid for Mat Latos (albeit, a better, younger, and cheaper option), it is understandable that the White Sox are not exactly eager to give Danks away for mid-level pieces, and are holding out for top prospects.  If Chicago’s price comes down I expect the Yankees to be interested, but demands of Montero plus Banuelos or Betances are simply excessive.  Matt Garza or Gio Gonzalez are other potential trade options that could fit the bill, but the price for these two is likely to be even higher than it is for Danks.

Yoenis Cespedes represents another direction that the Yankees could take this offseason.  Unlike the acquisition of a pitcher, Cespedes would largely be a move for the future rather than the present, since the Yankees at present have a full outfield and their top prospect occupying the DH role.  From the perspective of organizational depth, adding Cespedes could make sense because the Yankees don’t have many upper-level outfield prospects, so a replacement for Nick Swisher next year (should he walk in free agency) would be years away.  Cespedes would likely be affordable enough (on a per-annum basis) to not greatly affect either the austerity plan or the “screw austerity” plan, but the Yankees will have to decide if his talent is worth the contract demands.

While a lot of the big moves for this offseason have already occurred (except for Prince Fielder, whom the Yankees are presumably not going after), for the Yankees, the hot stove is just heating up.  I suspect that even if the Yankees intend to take the austerity path, they will not sit pat this offseason.  They know, as do many followers, that starting pitching remains an area of concern, and likely will be addressed.  Nonetheless, the moves that they do or do not make this offseason could give us some indication of the strategy that they intend to pursue over the next few years, so I will be paying close attention.

Follow Me On Twitter

9 Responses to With the Darvish drama over, what’s next for the Yankees?

  1. Matt DiBari says:

    I like Kuroda.

    I’m really not sure what Jackson adds to the Yankee rotation. I think we have plenty of fourth starters already.

  2. fredweis says:

    I think the Yanks are best off working with what they have (including minor league options)and seeing what develops.

    Cashman has enough pieces to make improvements in season, and he can roll the dice on a frontline stud whom he hopes to resign the following off season.

  3. T.O. Chris says:

    If Kuroda will take a 1 year deal I’m more than happy to bring him aboard, but if he wants 2+ years no thank you. He isn’t a top of the rotation starter, he threw 200 innings for the first time in 2011 (though he did throw 196 innings in 2010), and he’s going to be 37 in February. I’m a fan but all he really does is sure up the middle of the rotation, and I simply want no part of him past 2012.

    I want nothing to do with Oswalt and his decrepit back. Back issues don’t simply go away, they tend to only get worse, and he’s been dealing with it in some form since 2009 or before. Plus I’m not a fan of late in the career transitions from the NL to the AL.

    I like Jackson but not enough to sign him to a 4+ year deal for 13+ million per season. He’s not going to become a top of the rotation pitcher at this point, and if you are signing someone just to sure up the middle of the rotation for 2012 why sign them through 2014+. Decent pitcher overall, he just doesn’t fit our team at this time.

    At this point I’m willing to stick with Kuroda for a 1 year deal or go into the season as is. Latos was my number 1 target all offseason, but I guess the Yankees either missed the boat or didn’t want to trade for someone Else’s young ace.

  4. bg90027 says:

    I hate to say it but I’d say the two mostly likely scenarios are (1) go with the pitchers they already have and (2) resign Bartolo Colon if/when a market doesn’t develop for him.

    I don’t think they are all that interested in the names that get mentioned most often. Kuroda is reportedly close to signing with someone and the Yankees deny it’s them. There’s always a chance they make a big move for someone no one is even talking about but I don’t remember seeing anything suggesting they were much involved with Latos so if they didn’t try for him who would they aggressively pursue?

    • smurfy says:

      I like (1), to give a tryout to Noesi, and short ones to Warren, Phelps, and Mitchell.

      If we trade AJ, we should definitely sign Colon. Hell, for depth, I’d say go ahead and sign Bartolo.

      • Eric Schultz says:

        Agreed on Colon. As long as the price is right and he’ll take a 1-year deal (with no rotation spot guaranteed), I’d be all for bringing Bartolo back.

        • roadrider says:

          I wouldn’t bring Colon back. he was ready to implode at the end of last season. Who’s to say that his stem-cell shoulder will hold up for another year? I’m not so sure he would do better than Noesi, Warren, Phelps or Mitchell could do and at least those guys might have some future.

          • smurfy says:

            Definitely, somebody should find out how he’s feeling, but without winter ball, with a nice rest, maybe those 9 or so splendid starts in May into June, before his hammy sprang, could be twelve to fifteen 7 inning gems, cutting up the hitters like a fastball surgeon.

            • roadrider says:

              That’s wildly optimistic. The guy is 39 years old he’s not going to stay the same or get better he’s going to progressively decline and eventually fall off a cliff. At his age, with his medical history that likely means over the course of a season – maybe next season. There’s little reason to bring him back and block guys like Noesi, Warren, Phelps or Mitchell.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.