(The following is being syndicated from The Captain’s Blog).

Back in May, I examined some trends that suggested Mark Teixeira was evolving into a much more one-dimensional hitter. Despite beginning the season with what was for him an especially hot start, the switch hitting slugger’s splits still seemed to suggest the continuation of a pull-conscious batting approach that started in 2010. At the time, only 41 games had been played, so the sample size was limited, but now that three-quarters of the season has passed, we can take a more definitive look.

Using All Fields: Where Mark Teixeira Hits the Ball (% of batted balls)

Note: Off field = Opposite + Center.
Source: fangraphs.com and baseball-reference.com (OPS+)

The chart above looks almost exactly like the one from May 18. It shows a slight moderation in the number of balls pulled by Teixeira, but continues the more prevalent rise since 2007. The chart also continues to display the gradual decline in balls hit to the “off field”, although an inverse relationship between balls hit to center and the opposite field seems to exist. In addition, a moderate correlation between OPS+ and percentage of balls hit to the off field is also evident in the data.

Since the first analysis was run on May 18, Teixeira has been using the entire field a little bit more, especially as a left handed batter. Whereas the switch hitter had been pulling the ball in 57% of his at bats from the port side, his current rate stands at 55%. A more moderate decline has also been experienced from the right side (50% to 49%). However, there is a divergence in where those balls are being hit instead. As a lefty, Teixeira is now hitting the ball to left field in almost 19% of his at bats, an almost 2% rise since earlier in the season, giving him one of his highest opposite field percentages as a left hander over the last five years. Meanwhile, from the right side, the first baseman is using center field more, and mostly at the expense of the opposite field. On May 18, Teixeira’s split was 25%/25% to each sector, but now it stands at 30%/21% in favor of up the middle.

Mark Teixeira’s ”Spray Chart” as LHB, RHB (% of batted balls from each side)

Source: fangraphs.com

Now that we know Teixeira has been pulling the ball a little bit less than earlier in the season, the next question becomes, how has that impacted his results? Unfortunately, the answer is not so good, at least on the surface, which is indicated by his decline in OPS+ from 143 to 126 since May 18. More specifically, Teixeira’s batting average has either declined significantly or stayed relatively the same in every split. What’s more, his slugging percentage to the opposite field has generally declined, suggesting that even though he is going to the off field more, the result is often not for power. However, it should be noted that the one area in which Teixeira has improved his slugging percentage by a significant amount is when pulling the ball as a left handed hitter. Since May 18, his slugging percentage in that split has increased from .773 to .896.

Change in Teixeira’s Split Performance, May 18 vs. Present

Source: fangraphs.com

So, what conclusion can we draw from the data presented above? The first, and most obvious, is Teixeira has become a more pull conscious hitter, even if that trend has moderated a little this season. The second, and perhaps more surprising, conclusion is that as Teixeira has used the opposite field it has mitigated against his increase in power to the pull field, even though that approach might actually be improving his pull-field numbers (i.e., a ball on the outside corner slapped the other way for a single, or even an out, might be removing a “roll over” ground ball from his pull data). If so, Teixeira is presented with a classic supply/demand scenario. Is it better to pull less with better results, or pull more, and hope the quantity makes up for the decline in quality?

It’s worth noting that Teixeira’s slightly modified approach hasn’t really altered his numbers, so it could be that absent a more drastic change, the switch hitter has settled in at his equilibrium point. After all, on May 18, when he was pulling the ball more, his batting average and slugging were .254 and .500, respectively, and now, when he using more of the field, those rates stand at .249 and .510. So, even if his approach has changed a little, the results have remained the same. Because Texeira’s decline in OPS stems almost entirely from OBP, which has fallen from from .378 to .346, it seems as if his use of the off field has simply been a vehicle to shift outs away from the pull side.

As mentioned in the initial analysis, Mark Teixeira’s evolution as a hitter is undeniable. Although he has remained deadly from the pull side, his ability to go up the middle and to the opposite field with meaningful success has diminished. Because of his powers, as well as his glove, Teixeira can still be a very valuable player, even if the trend is irreversible. However, it does suggest that the heights of his career production may no longer be attainable, all else being equal.

Follow Me On Twitter

 

7 Responses to Revisiting Mark Teixeira’s Offensive Evolution

  1. As usual, awesome, awesome stuff William. Excel graphs are manna from stat geek heaven.

  2. MJ Recanati says:

    Agree with Larry, great, informative post.

    Try as I might, I just haven’t warmed to Teixeira in the same way that I never warmed to Giambi. I fully grant that both Teixeira and Giambi are/were productive members of the team; it’s just that…well, I simply expected more. Perhaps that’s unfair but, as your graphs show, Teixeira isn’t quite the player he was before he arrived in New York and I guess I was hoping we’d see more of the 2007-2008 Teixeira instead of just that little taste of his greatness that we saw 2009.

    Oh well. I certainly don’t hate him or anything and I’m always rooting for him to do well. But my favorite he ain’t.

  3. Joe says:

    I feel the same way about not warming up to him. My favorites are always the homegrown guys. Regarding his statistics… Although it sucks he isn’t playing like he did in 07-09, I’m sure most teams in either league would take a .250 1B with 35-40 bombs and 100 RBI whom plays solid defense any day.

  4. Frank says:

    There’s no question his defense is stellar, but offensively, I’ve been very disappointed as well, especially during A-Rod’s absence when I thought he would step forward offensively. Yes, he hits HR’s, but there are many times he comes to bat in a clutch situation and fails to come through with even a productive out, either striking out or hitting weak pop ups. Maybe he improves a bit when A-rod returns although I wouldn’t mind him and Cano switching places in the batting order.

  5. Duh, Innings! says:

    Gardner/Jeter/Granderson/Rodriguez/Cano/Teixiera/Swisher/Jones-Chavez-Posada DH/Martin-Cervelli

    Teixiera doesn’t hit for high enough BA or OBP to be a 3, 4, or 5 hitter.

  6. David Brown says:

    This article is exactly why I think that there are too many stats in sports (You can manipulate numbers to reach a given conclussion).Mark Teixeira is NOT Jason Giambi. Why? Lets start with Defense, move on to steroids, then finally end up with Championships (Tex has one more than Giambi ever had). Since you guys want to use stats here are a few for you: With 300 Home Runs and 1,000 RBI’s he is on way to 500 HRS and over 1,500 RBI’s, and this year (Unless he gets injured) he will have over 120 RBIs (He is at 94 now, and 6 more means eight straight of 100 or more).That record is shared by Gehrig, Foxx & Arod (13), Pujols has the NL Record of 10 (He needs 24 more to get to 11). Guess what? This guy is a future Hall of Famer.

    • William J. says:

      If you don’t like stats, that’s fine. As a fan, you’re not paid to make proper evaluations, so you are free to enjoy any part of the game you like. However, I am not sure why you seem to feel threatened by them, especially considering all the conclusions to which you objected were not mentioned in the post (you brought them up).

      Nowhere in the post does it say Teixeira IS Giambi (which really wouldn’t be a bad thing from an offensive standpoint. Also, I assume you read the whole post, so Tex’ defense is specifically noted. Finally, the conclusion clearly states Tex can be very valuable even as a strict pull hitter.

      If you can point to evidence suggesting Tex hasn’t become one-dimensional, fire away. Otherwise, listing his RBIs is irrelevant (I thought there were too many stats anyway?), except to the strawman you created.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.