During the 2009-2010 offseason, when it became apparent that the Tigers will willing to trade Curtis Granderson, the Yankees reviewed their system and determined that Austin Jackson‘s best-case scenario would be turning into Granderson, and therefore decided to trade future potential for the already-established model.

Granderson had come off a down season in 2009, but the Yankees were optimistic that he could recapture some of the glory of his outstanding 2007 campaign. He launched a home run off Josh Beckett in his first game with the Bombers, and then began to struggle. Curtis posted a meager .314 wOBA in April. He played five games in May and began heating up to the tune of a .429 wOBA before coming up lame with a groin injury. A-Jax, meanwhile, launched out of the gate with a .530 BABIP, leading many in Yankeeland to criticize the trade for Granderson.

At season’s end, however, Granderson was the better player. A-Jax won the fWAR battle, accumulating 3.8 to Granderson’s 3.6, but that’s because he played more games. Granderson posted a .346 wOBA overall, beating out A-Jax’s .333. Furthermore, Granderson hit for far more power, belting 24 bombs to A-Jax’s 4. As rocky a start as his first season was, Granderson still represented a major upgrade in center over Melky Cabrera. He’s also on a team-friendly contract and on the right side of 30. If he performs for the Yankees he can solve the team’s problems in center field for the next several seasons. If he doesn’t, the team can cut him loose, making him someone else’s problem.

Beneath the surface, Granderson had an uneven 2010 to say the least. He struggled in nearly every month save September, and the fears many fans had of Granderson struggling against lefties mostly came to fruition, as he was a .269 wOBA hitter against southpaws. Granderson did manage to salvage his season to an extent with his out-of-his-mind September, in which he had a .411 wOBA and hit 9 home runs. That performance turned his year around, and gave the Yankees some life just when the team was sputtering. Curtis’ hot hitting continued through the playoffs, and he was one of the few Yankee starters who did anything in the ALCS against the Rangers.

Granderson came to the Yankees with an open, busy, helicopter swing. He would move his arms and legs in the box, and tighten up as the pitch was delivered (Mark Teixeira does something similar still). It is unclear if this swing caused his troubles last season, but Kevin Long went to work on it after Joe Girardi benched Granderson at the end August for his struggles. Curtis returned a changed man with a changed swing. He stopped all the extra motion. Like Nick Swisher, and then later Alex Rodriguez, Granderson would even place the bat on his shoulder, something Long recommends to all his disciples. The results were stellar, and outlined above.

2011 is a critical year for Granderson. After peaking in 2007 with a .395 wOBA, Granderson has seen his performance decline every season since, save for 2010. He posted a .374 wOBA in 2008 and then a .340 wOBA in 2009. His .346 wOBA last season did stop the decline technically, but really Curtis was treading water, and the performance was far from steady. If Granderson is to continue to be regarded as a better than average player then he will need to demonstrate it this season. If he doesn’t, he’ll have posted three consecutive average seasons and may not be long for the Bronx. To his credit, Granderson has one of the best reputations in baseball, and appears dedicated to his craft. The question is not if he will work at mastering the swing Kevin Long gave him. It is actually whether or not that swing was a long term solution to Curtis’ struggles. We’ll only know for sure once the season begins.

For my part, I believe Granderson is in a position to improve on his 2010 performance, but I also really like him as a person, which tends to influence my expectations. He falls into the same category as A.J. Burnett for me –  something about his personality makes me believe he’ll always find a way to perform well, even when he doesn’t.

The fact of the matter regarding Curtis this coming season is that apart from Mark Teixeira, he has the largest range for his performance of anyone on the team. When he’s bad, he’s really bad. When he’s good he’s almost unbeatable. He has all the athletic ability in the world. Hopefully that and his new swing are enough to turn him into a consistent, .360 wOBA hitter. We’ll be in a position to find out soon enough.

7 Responses to 2011 Yankees Preview: Center Field

  1. William J. says:

    I think you also have to give credit to Granderson for having a very good defensive season. If he continues to play as well in the field, I’d sign up for a .350 wOBA over the course of a full season. In that sense, Granderson really doesn’t need to improve. He just needs to stay healthy.

    I also don’t think it’s fair to say he has just been average over the past two seasons. Finally, if we are going to give credence to BABIP, it should be noted that Granderson’s has only been .275 and .277 in the last two seasons. Before then, it was much higher.

  2. Matt Warden says:

    Nice piece, Mike. Certainly leaves room for optimism!

  3. Thanks Matt. There’s reason to be optimistic, just cautiously so.

  4. [...] more here: 2011 Yankees Preview: Center Field | New York Yankees blog … AKPC_IDS += "10662,"; AKPC_IDS += [...]

  5. Ken (O.R.) says:

    Nice, I agree with Matt!
    Question; who should be in CF, Brett or Curtis?
    I like Brett in CF, What say you?

  6. My attitude is that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Gardner rated as the best defensive player in all of baseball last year, according to Fangraphs UZR. We don’t know how much of that value he would lose if the team were to move him back to Center. Granderson gets the job done at a positive clip as well. Between the two of them the Yankees have an excellent defensive combo manning the deepest part of Yankee Stadium. Even if there is some additional value to be had from swapping the two, it would be marginal, and it would attract uneeded media attention. Unless Granderson regresses severely in the field I think things are good for the moment, even if Gardner is the better defender.

    • T.O. Chris says:

      “Even if there is some additional value to be had from swapping the two, it would be marginal, and it would attract uneeded media attention. Unless Granderson regresses severely in the field I think things are good for the moment, even if Gardner is the better defender.”

      Couldn’t agree more with this statement! The possible negative outcome of Granderson feeling snubbed or pushed off of CF could outweigh the positive outcome (minor defensive upgrade) from the move.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.