Lengthy Debate: Evaluating Baseball's Longest and Most Lucrative Contracts
(The following is being syndicated from The Captain’s Blog).
Before the ink had tried on Troy Tulowitzki’s 10-year, $157.8 million contract extension, several pundits questioned the wisdom of the Rockies’ decision to enter into such a long-term pact, especially after the team’s experience with Mike Hampton and Todd Helton (the fallacy of the later suggestion is displayed below). For some reason, it seems as if a conventional wisdom has developed that suggests these mega-deals are inherently bad. However, although all long-term deals are not without risk, especially a 10-year pact, there must be circumstances under which they are appropriate? To test that hypothesis, the 20 largest contracts (defined as at least seven years in length and $90 million in value) are considered below.
Expired Long-Term, High-Value Deals ($ millions)
| Player (Term) | Total | Avg. Salary | Value^ | Yrs Incl.* | Value/ Year | Surplus/ Deficit |
| Albert Pujols (2004-10) | $100 | $14.3 | $226.1 | 7 | $32.3 | $18.0 |
| Scott Rolen (2003-10) | $90 | $11.3 | $132 | 8 | $16.5 | $5.3 |
| Alex Rodriguez (2001-10)# | $252 | $25.2 | $220 | 9 | $24.4 | -$0.76 |
| Derek Jeter (2001-10) | $189 | $18.9 | $151.7 | 9 | $16.9 | -$2.0 |
| Manny Ramirez (2001-08) | $160 | $20 | $103.8 | 7 | $14.8 | -$5.2 |
| Jason Giambi (2002-08) | $120 | $17.1 | $78 | 7 | $11.1 | -$6.0 |
| Kevin Brown (1999-2005) | $105 | $15 | $31.1 | 4 | $7.8 | -$7.3 |
| Ken Griffey Jr. (2000-08)+ | $116.5 | $12.9 | $17.6 | 7 | $2.5 | -$10.4 |
| Mike Hampton (2001-08) | $121 | $15.1 | $23.8 | 7 | $3.4 | -$11.7 |
^Based on Fangraphs’ calculations of player value.
*Years included in comparison may be less than contract term because data was only available since 2002.
#Arod opted out of this contract after the 2007 season, but his subsequent performance is still considered.
+Approximately 57% of Griffey’s contract was deferred.
Note: Option years are not considered, nor is deferred money factored into the calculations.
Source: Cots Contracts and fangraphs.com
Based on the chart above, Albert Pujols’ contract stands out as the undisputed champion of long-term bargains. In fact, the $18 million per year premium enjoyed by the Cardinals suggests that the organization would have been wise to offer an even longer deal to their immortal first baseman. The other clear cut bargain in the group was Scott Rolen, which comes as a bit of surprise, especially considering four of his seasons were truncated because of injuries.
The next two contracts that appear to be laggers, but probably should be shifted comfortably to the outperformers belong to Alex Rodriguez and Derek Jeter. Arod’s case is an easy one because his annual deficit is already below $1 million. So, when you factor in his strong 2001 (which isn’t included in the analysis), the level of deferred money, marquee value as well as post season contribution, it should be easy to see why Arod’s original contract would have ended up a bargain if served to completion. In the case of Jeter, his $2 million annual deficit also not only ignores post season performance and brand-related value, but also exists largely because fangraph’s calculations incorporate UZR, which tends to treat Jeter rather severely. Considering the unreliability of this metric, there is a lot of wiggle room to give Jeter a bump in terms of value. So, with all caveats considered, Jeter also appears to have been a relative bargain over the past 10 years.
One nebulous case, rather appropriately, belongs to Manny Ramirez. If defense wasn’t factored into the equation, Ramirez’ value would likely exceed his salary. However, as with Jeter, UZR cripples his value. Considering the tendency to underrate left fielders who play most of their games at Fenway Park, it’s probably safe to assume that Manny being Manny was closer to break even than indicated above. However, the $5 million deficit is large enough to prevent Ramirez’ contract from being considered a bargain.
Mike Hampton’s mega-deal stands alone as the all-time worst, thanks to a near $100,000,000 million underperformance (and that’s before factoring in the value of the Denver school system). Although Ken Griffey Jr.’s contract seems to approach Hampton’s in terms of its annual deficit, it should be noted that nearly 60% of the former was deferred (thus significantly lessening its “real” value). Also, two of Griffey’s best seasons under the deal were not included in the analysis. The same is also true of Kevin Brown, whose strong 1999 and 2000 campaigns were omitted. Finally, like Ramirez, Jason Giambi’s value was severely taxed by his weakness on defense. However, that impact is mitigated by his position, making his $6 million annual deficit seem more accurate.
Ongoing Long-Term, High-Value Deals
| Player (Term) | Total | Avg. Salary | Value^ | Yrs Incl.* | Value/ Year | Surplus/ Deficit |
| Matt Holliday (2010-16) | $120 | $17.1 | $27.6 | 1 | $27.6 | $10.5 |
| Miguel Cabrera (2008-15) | $152.3 | $19.0 | $63 | 3 | $21 | $2.0 |
| CC Sabathia (2009-15) | $161 | $23 | $48.8 | 2 | $24.4 | $1.4 |
| Carlos Beltran (2005-11) | $119 | $17 | $105.4 | 6 | $17.6 | $0.57 |
| Todd Helton (2003-13) # | $151.4 | $13.8 | $111.9 | 8 | $14.0 | $0.22 |
| Alfonso Soriano (2007-14) | $136 | $17 | $59.3 | 4 | $14.8 | -$2.2 |
| Mark Teixeira (2009-16) | $180 | $22.5 | $38.2 | 2 | $19.1 | -$3.4 |
| Alex Rodriguez (2008-17) | $275 | $27.5 | $62.9 | 3 | $21.0 | -$6.5 |
| Vernon Wells (2008-14) | $126 | $18 | $22.6 | 3 | $7.5 | -$10.5 |
| Joe Mauer (2011-18) | $184 | $23 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Troy Tulowitzki (2011-20) | $157.8 | $15.8 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
^Based on Fangraphs’ calculations of player value.
*Years included are to-date 2010.
#The terms of Helton’s deal were originally 9-years, $141.5 million, but a two-year extension was added along with a deferral of 13.1 million.
Note: Option years are not considered, nor is deferred money factored into the calculations.
Source: Cots Contracts and fangraphs.com
So far, it looks as if Matt Holliday, Miguel Cabrera and CC Sabathia have gotten off to a good start in providing above-contract value. However, those players are still in the infancy of their deals, and value contributed tends to decline, not increase, over the length of long-term contracts. Because Cabrera is already three years into his deal, and still only 27, he seems like the best bet of the three to live up to his monetary expectations.
Two contracts that have almost run their course belong to Carlos Beltran and Todd Helton, both of whom have pretty much provided equal value. In Beltran’s case, he has one more year to tilt the balance in either direction, while Helton’s deal still has three years thanks to an extension that was added in March 2010. Both players are likely to underperform their average annual salary over the final year years of their current deals, but each should end up close to an acceptable threshold.
The contracts of Alfonso Soriano and Mark Teixeira are in red flag territory as each has already dipped several million dollars below par. In Soriano’s case, the concern is likely merited, but Teixeira’s underperformance is easier to dismiss. Again, the culprit seems to be UZR, which doesn’t think as highly of Teixeira’s defense as other metrics and evaluators. Also, Teixeira is four years younger than Soriano, and thus more likely to maintain a prime-level of performance.
Alex Rodriquez’ second contract has not fared as well as his first. Despite delivering an impressive annual value, Arod’s inflated salary makes the contract look destined to be a bust. Of course, that’s really a relative concern. Although some of his off field value was likely lessened by steroid revelations, brand equity is an important consideration in Arod’s deal. It remains to be seen how fervently the baseball world will be follow Rodriguez’ pursuit of homerun milestones, but even a small ratings bump on YES could mitigate some of the perceived overpayment in salary. Vernon Wells’ contract, however, appears to be a lost cause. Although he did have a bounce back year in 2010, the Blue Jays centerfielder is already 31, making him a good bet to challenge Hampton for the worst long-term deal of all time.
In 2011, at least two more long-term mega-deals will commence: an eight year deal for Joe Mauer and the aforementioned 10-year extension for Tulowitzki. Because the latter contract was signed four years prior to free agency, and Tulowitzki is still only 25, the smart money says it will end up in the bargain column. In fact, it seems to be in the mold of Arod’s and Jeter’s long-term deals referenced above (an athletic, mid-20s shortstop with a plus bat). Mauer also has age on his side (he is only 28), but his salary, which was negotiated only one year away from free agency, is a much higher $23 million. Also, as a catcher, Mauer is more prone to injury and more likely to experience a sharper, more rapid decline. Nonetheless, the early years of Mauer’s contract could provide enough of a buffer to net out above par by the time 2018 rolls around.
Although there have definitely been some colossal-sized busts, there have also been a few bargains from among baseball’s longest and most lucrative contracts. One rule of thumb seems to be that if a team signs a young player at a skilled position to a long-term deal, it should come out ahead. However, the closer the players gets to (and then from) 30, as well as the farther he gets from the middle of the diamond, the less likely it becomes that the contract will earn equal or greater value. Keep that in mind this offseason when players like Carl Crawford and Jayson Werth sign their inevitable big money deals
4 Responses to Lengthy Debate: Evaluating Baseball's Longest and Most Lucrative Contracts
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
LIKE TYA ON FACEBOOK
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
- TYA To Merge With It’s About The Money, Stupid
- What about Kevin Youkilis?
- Teix Now Front And Center On The “Needs To Produce” Radar
- Cashman: Heathcott A Dark Horse Candidate
- A Dog Chasing Cars
- Outfield Trade Targets
- The Problem With Brett Gardner
- A Look At Relief Prospect Branden Pinder
- The Yankees Should Be Realistic, Put Team on Short Leash in 2013
- Briefly discussing the internal options to replace Curtis Granderson
Recent Comments
- Louis Vuitton Outlet Sale Singapore on The Monthly Prospector: April Edition
- Authentic Louis Vuitton Outlet Store on The Monthly Prospector: June Edition
- Louis Vuitton Outlet San Diego on Banuelos to Undergo Tommy John Surgery, Yankees Prospectors to Undergo Grief Counseling
- related web site on The Great Subway Race
- get your lover back on Contact Us
- Dorothy Silvan on Pineda’s Torn Labrum, or Does the lemon law apply to baseball?
- tao of badass on Open Thread | Game 3 | Detroit Tigers vs. New York Yankees | Sunday, April 3, 2011
- tube launch review on Why Has Attendance Fallen Year-To-Year?
- Evon Znidarsic on Teixeira MRI Update, Babe Ruth Pitching In Pinstripes, And Jeter’s Gift Baskets
- Sacramento PC Repair on Yanks finally sign non-Yankee free agent in Russell Martin
Authors
Twitter
* TYA Twitter - @YankeeAnalysts
* EJ Fagan - @ejfagan
* Matt Imbrogno -@mimbro1
* William J. -@WilliamNYY23
* Larry Koestler-@Larry_Koestler
* Moshe Mandel -@MosheTYA
* Sean P. -@Sean_MP
* Eric Schultz - @Eric_J_S
* Matt Warden - @Matt_Warden
- Most poker sites open to US players also provide online casinos accepting USA players. A good example of this is BetOnline.com, where you can play 3D casino games, bet on sports or play poker from anywhere in the United States.
Other Links
Blogroll
Blogs
- An A-Blog for A-Rod
- Beat of the Bronx
- Bronx Banter
- Bronx Baseball Daily
- Bronx Brains
- Don't Bring in the Lefty
- Fack Youk
- It's About The Money
- iYankees
- Lady Loves Pinstripes
- Lenny's Yankees
- New Stadium Insider
- No Maas
- Pinstripe Alley
- Pinstripe Mystique
- Pinstriped Bible
- River Ave. Blues
- RLYW
- Second Place Is Not An Option
- Steven Goldman
- The Captain's Blog
- The Girl Who Loved Andy Pettitte
- The Greedy Pinstripes
- This Purist Bleeds Pinstripes
- Value Over Replacement Grit
- WasWatching
- Yankee Source
- Yankeeist
- Yankees Blog | ESPN New York
- Yankees Fans Unite
- YFSF
- You Can't Predict Baseball
- Zell's Pinstripe Blog
Resources
- Baseball Analysts
- Baseball Musings
- Baseball Prospectus
- Baseball Think Factory
- Baseball-Intellect
- Baseball-Reference
- BBTF Baseball Primer
- Beyond the Box Score
- Brooks Baseball
- Cot's Baseball Contracts
- ESPN's MLB Stats & Info Blog
- ESPN's SweetSpot Blog
- FanGraphs
- Joe Lefkowitz's PitchFX Tool
- Minor League Ball
- MLB Trade Rumors
- NYMag.com's Sports Section
- TexasLeaguers.com
- The Biz of Baseball
- THE BOOK
- The Hardball Times
- The Official Site of The New York Yankees
- The Wall Street Journal's Daily Fix Sports Blog
- YESNetwork.com
Site Organization
Categories
Tags
A.J. Burnett Alex Rodriguez Andy Pettitte Austin Romine Baltimore Orioles Bartolo Colon Boston Red Sox Brett Gardner Brian Cashman Bullpen CC Sabathia Chien-Ming Wang Cliff Lee Curtis Granderson David Robertson Dellin Betances Derek Jeter Francisco Cervelli Freddy Garcia Game Recap Hiroki Kuroda Ivan Nova Javier Vazquez Jesus Montero Joba Chamberlain Joe Girardi Johnny Damon Jorge Posada Manny Banuelos Mariano Rivera Mark Teixeira Melky Cabrera Michael Pineda New York New York Yankees Nick Johnson Nick Swisher Phil Hughes Prospects Rafael Soriano Red Sox Robinson Cano Russell Martin Tampa Bay Rays YankeesSite Stats






It’s an interesting analysis so I don’t mean my comments to be overly critical. If the whole purpose of the calculation is to judge whether a particular long term commitment was a good one or not though, I think it’s overly simplistic. For one thing, it is misleading to compare side by side players who had years of team control left when they signed with free agent contracts. You should expect surplus value when you take the risk of buying out arbitration eligible years. It seems to me, if the purpose of the exercise is judging whether the contracts were favorable to the team or not, the inflection point should be at some positive value for these contracts and at some negative surplus value for free agent contracts which you would enter into knowing that they would be relatively more expensive than locking up a player under team control. Also, it seems to me that calculating player value in a linear fashion as fangraphs does is highly flawed. Each increment of WAR should be worth more than the last because it because it becomes much harder to replace. I think this especially results in an undervaluing of elite pitching.
I think the post implies that total values are impacted by service time (see the comparison of Tulo to Mauer), so I don’t think it’s misleading. I don’t, however, begrudge you the opinion that it is simplistic. Having said that, I would point out that even though a team may expect a premium for buying out arbitration, that doesn’t change that fact that value received was (or wasn’t) in line with salary paid, which is the point. Considering the small sample of similar-sized contracts, I am not sure how you could scientifically establish inflection points based on different variables.
I do agree that Fangraphs valuation has flaws (some which I name), but it is the only publicly available data (at least that I know of) vetted enough to be useful for such an analysis.
What homers. The Manny Ramirez signing has been ranked as the TOP value in baseball history by objective sources such as ESPN and CBS News. You homers, he gave Boston two rings. He played the Green Monster well enough, but even if he had only DHed those 8 years, his signing would still top greatest contract values in MLB HISTORY.
Yes, homers. Using freely available data and simply applying it shows real homerism.