Yesterday, ESPN’s Buster Olney tweeted that, along with the Mets, the Yankees were out of the Aroldis Chapman sweepstakes, with Olney citing a general front office concern as to whether or not Chapman was better suited to serve as a reliever or a starter (spending $20 million or more on an eventual bullpen cog seemed problematic).

The decision to bow out of the market for the prized Cuban southpaw made a certain degree of sense beyond role concerns, as well, as Chapman is far from a polished prospect. He needs to improve upon his overall command, which was fairly poor in Cuba, while bettering the quality of his breaking pitches. For these reasons, according to the Boston Globe’s Pete Abraham, the Yankees believe Chapman must begin his American career in the lower minor leagues, in Single-A ball, but he and his representation seem to disagree. Therefore, despite the talent inherent to his spidery left arm, the Yankees’ decision, while disappointing to some, was certainly understandable. Furthermore, last night, it appeared as though the Angels were nearing a deal for Chapman, so perhaps the hunt was over.

Today, however — there’s always a “however” — we hear from a report that conflicts with Olney’s, for it states that the Yankees could still be in on the Hendricks brothers’ sought after young client. According to Gordon Edes of ESPN Boston, “[c]ontrary to reports that have pegged the Angels and Blue Jays as favorites to sign the 22-year old pitcher, the Red Sox remain very much in the picture, [with] one major league executive predicting that either the Sox or Yankees will sign him.” The executive added, “This one is for the big-money teams,” although I think it’s fair to call the Angels, who are in the top ten for team payroll, a “big-money team,” too. If Boston, a club which offered Chapman a $15 million contract a few weeks ago, prior to his representation switch, is still in the thick of it, I would think that the Yankees, so as to drive up the price for the Red Sox, would at least stay in the race on a superficial level.

So, could we see some sort of surprise Aroldis Chapman signing by the Yankees this week? I definitely wouldn’t count on it, as most recent reports seem to favor the Angels or the Blue Jays and Olney ruled the Bombers out yesterday (he’s generally believable). However, if Gedes’ executive is, indeed, accurate, for those in favor of adding Chapman — and I know there are a number of you — I guess you can view his latest report as a glimmer of hope.

Either way, he’s poised to sign soon, so the speculation will finally conclude.

Photo by the AP

6 Responses to Yanks still in on Chapman?

  1. Good bye Melky says:

    Yankees should drive the price up to 40-55 million, then walk away!, leaving beantown holding the bag!

  2. Jay says:

    He will wind up with the Angels. First, they have Morales to ease the transition, and this means a great deal. If the White Sox were in, they would be a front runner for the same reason; moving to a new place and not speaking the language is difficult. At least in California, he will be able to be with his friend. Second, the Angels haven’t added anything major this offseason while losing numerous parts. Chapman, paired with the 3 first round picks, will drastically improve the farm system of the Angels.

  3. Steve S. says:

    Not sure I buy this. The quote seems to be very broad, saying big money=Yankees almost automatically without seeming to have any real info in this specific instance.

    Plus, the Boston press thinks the Yanks are going to sign everyone, all the time, because they’re paranoid and irrational just like the Sox fans who read their columns.

  4. Let Chapman sign with other teams. If the Red Sox gets involved the Yankees can start their bluffing game until the Red sox signs Chapman for $ 25 million.

    It’s absurd! Why would the Yankees sign a player that is unproven….. let Chapman prove his worth first.

    The Yankees are better off getting pitchers from the free agency. CC Sabathia is a good pick-up, Cliff Lee could be another one… I prefer the free agency route.

  5. JMK aka The Overshare says:

    First, Chapman is a free agent. Second, if he were proven, he’d cost $125 million, not $25 million. The reason you get unproven talent too is because of these things called “budgets.” Even the Yankees can’t afford 25 CCs and A-Rods. A guy who could perform the value of what you’d pay $20 mil. per season, but do it for $5 million, means you’re able to allocate that available money toward other needs.

    Are you purposely being obtuse?

  6. bornwithpinstripes says:

    how about saving the 20 plus mil for a guy thats 2 3 years out and an unknown.. and give it to cliff lee??? we were burned by igawa 20mil to talk to him and then 4mil per at 4 years, and irabu also… i think igawa money ends this year?? any one know

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.