Yesterday, FOX Sports’ Ken Rosenthal wrote about the future of Cuban import, Aroldis Chapman, stating that it would not be surprising if a “low-revenue” (e.g. Marlins, A’s) organization rather than a big money club (e.g., Yankees, Red Sox, Angels) ultimately inked the desired left-hander to a deal. Rosenthal claims that “the Yankees and Red Sox, in the newest phase of their blood rivalry, want efficient players at efficient prices,” and, for that reason, may avoid Chapman, who was “not an efficient pitcher in Cuba” and “will not come at an efficient price.” A few days ago, Jorge Arangure Jr. speculated that Chapman could receive $25 million given the recent groundswell of interest following his successful Houston showcase. Still, despite the price, Rosenthal picks the Marlins as the likeliest to sign the young southpaw.

While the Marlins reportedly have extra resources in hand to divert to Chapman and have already provided him with a multiyear offer “in the $13 million range,” I cannot see the Yankees failing to capture the talented Cuban prospect due to his cost. Now, I agree with Rosenthal’s assessment of the Yankees’ approach as of late — their offseason, thus far, has yielded a series of financially efficient acquisitions, as the average annual cost of players acquired has been relatively low — however, I disagree in his application of this assessment to a high-upside, long-term investment like Aroldis Chapman. The Yankees, as seen in the draft, for instance, have demonstrated that they are more than willing to take a gamble on talented young arms and Chapman, outside of his price tag and unrestricted free agent situation, is really no different. Despite the lanky lefty’s “inefficient” production in Cuba and “inefficient” cost, with regards to Yankee personnel, I’m sure they see the potential value in signing such a player and, in the end, will fight for him.

Photo by Reuters

2 Responses to Will Chapman end up in Florida?

  1. Jay says:

    The more I think about it, the more I would rather see Mateo signed instead of Chapman. First, Mateo will cost a tenth of what Chapman costs. Second, the Yankees farm system is filled with “lotto ticket” pitchers; ones that could be very good MLB pitchers. The system is devoid of outfielders outside of Heathcott. What it boils down to is that all prospects are lotto tickets, some just function in a lotto with better odds. The fact that Chapman throws 100 should not warrant a 25 million dollar payday in and of itself. If the Yankees believe that it will take him four years before he is a strong contributor, they may think it isn’t worth the gamble.

  2. Ken (O.R.) says:

    The way it looks to me, it is up to the pitching guy (I can’t remember his name) Cash just signed. If that guy likes Chapman…the Yanks will have him. If he isn’t high on the guy…see ya latter Chap ole boy. If he can’t give a glowing report on the guy to Hal, no deal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.