As it stands right now, the Yankees have a pretty damn good starting rotation. All three of CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett, and Javier Vasquez could easily head the rotations of just about any team in baseball. While I think we’d all agree that Sabathia is the ace and leader of the staff, I think there is room for debate as to who is the Yankees’ second best starter.

Because of how it lined up this past year–and the success the rotation had in 2009–it seems that everyone assumes Burnett will be the second starter, followed by Andy Pettitte, followed by Vasquez, followed by Jophil Chamberhughes. By the end of the season, though, I think we’ll all see that Vasquez is a fourth starter in “number” only.

Both the CHONE and CAIRO systems project the incredibly durable Vazquez (no fewer than 198 innings since 1999) to throw more innings than Burnett, walk fewer than Burnett, and strike more batters out than Burnett. We could be cautious about this because of the limited success Vazquez had in the A.L. East in 2004, but that’s a one year sample that was heavily swayed by one awful half of a baseball season.

Combining the two projection systems, we can expect the Burnett/Vazquez combo to post an ERA of about 3.91 which, in the A.L. East would be great.

Both pitchers have their upsides and their flaws. Vazquez always puts up great peripherals, but somehow, the ERA doesn’t quite follow. He pitches massive amounts of innings and truly racks up strikeouts, but he also gives up his fair share of gopher balls. Burnett is similar in many ways. His stuff is arguably the best stuff in baseball, but his control can be an issue at times. And, while he’s gotten through the last two season without injury issues, I think we’re all holding our breath for something to happen to A.J.

Regardless of how you line the five Yankee starters up, their rotation will be a strength in 2010.

In CC Sabathia, they have what everyone wants in a pitcher: he eats innings and performs at a high level during all those innings. In A.J. Burnett, they have a guy who can be flat-out nasty for extended periods of time, despite some periods of frustration. In Andy Pettitte, they have a time-tested veteran who will always give you innings. In Javier Vazquez, they have a hybrid of Sabathia and Burnett: a workhorse who can also be a little frustrating. In either Joba Chamberlain or Phil Hughes, they have a youngster with almost unlimited potential who could explode onto the scene at any second.

The Yankee rotation is far from perfect, just like every rotation in baseball, but it still looks like it’s going to be one of the better ones in the American League. Pairing that rotation with the already potent offense gives the Yankees a very bright outlook for 2010, one that could potentially outshine 2009.

Follow Me On Twitter

6 Responses to Lining Up The Yankee Rotation

  1. MJ says:

    As we all know, the rotation order only matters on Opening Day, the first game back from the All-Star break and in Game 1 of any playoff series. Other than those times, it’s a disordered jumble due to workloads, off-days, rainouts, makeup games and double-headers.

    I’d probably go Sabathia-Burnett-Pettitte-Vazquez simply because I like the idea of staggering lefties and righties and, because, frankly, I believe in giving CC, AJ and Andy a slight edge in terms of seniority and accomplishment. It may not mean anything but I’d rather Javy “earn” a Game 2 or Game 3 start in the playoffs. If he does, it potentially means that something has gone very, very right for him this year.

    • Moshe Mandel says:

      Agree with everything you said. We are in sync today. Yes, Vazquez could possibly earn a higher slot, but if they were playing a postseason series tomorrow, I would have him 4th. The other guys earned their spots by winning a title, and it is not like Vazquez is appreciably better than the other two.

  2. Steve S. says:

    Nice piece, Matt. You touched on a nerve with me, that Vasquez may very well be better than Burnett next year and would be our 2nd starter should we make the playoffs. That was pretty much my point in the piece I did this morning.

    Also, I’m a bit worried about Andy. For two seasons in a row, he’s run out of gas down the stretch. He found a way in the playoffs, but at 38 I’m beginning to worry about his margin for error shrinking past the point of effectiveness. I haven’t crunched the numbers yet, but will try to do so over the weekend.

    • Moshe Mandel says:

      Andy was better in the second half than the 1st, and was solid until his last 2-3 starts. He was also very good in the playoffs. I’m not really worried.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.