Matt Murton, of the Colorado Rockies, was DFA’d on Wednesday so that the Rox could make room for reliever Juan Rincon. Murton is an interesting player—he hit .321/.388/.489 in 86 minor-league games this season—and one that I’ve written about before.

Prior to joining the Rockies this year, Murton was with the Cubs and was perpetually blocked from joining the Chicago OF on a full-time basis (they had Soriano and had signed Fukudome). Murton was then shipped over to the A’s in the deal for Rich Harden. At that point, I thought there was hope for the skilled young outfielder and maybe, just maybe, he’d finally get to play on a regular basis. That was not the case, though, as Rockies then acquired Murton early this year in exchange for an IF prospect and have kept him in Triple-A for most of the year (he has been blocked by a number of other players).

Last July, I wrote that the Yankees should trade for Murton (from the Cubs) so that he may man right once Bobby Abreu exited New York. He’s a contact hitter that gets on base and can play solid defense (if not above average, then average). He seemed like the type of player the Yankees were talking about when we heard that they wanted to get “younger” and become “more athletic.” Of course, after writing that piece, literally 2 hours later Murton was traded to Oakland.

Now that Murton has been DFA’d and is available on waivers (irrevocable waivers), I think it would make sense for the Yankees to throw their hat in the ring and attempt to acquire him. Next year, assuming that they let Hideki Matsui walk and bring back Johnny Damon, Murton—a righty—could be a useful bat that mans LF on occasion or even on a regular basis while Johnny Damon splits time between LF and the DH role. He’s a good enough player to help the team with its depth issues if they actually do decide to use the DH spot as a rotating resting chair for its aging veterans.

As R.J. Anderson of FanGraphs notes, “Matt Murton has major league baseball player talent, some team should give him the label, jersey, and roster spot and reap the benefits.” Given the flexibility and skill set that Murton ultimately provides, I think that the Yankees should be that team. Murton could stick as a regular and, at worst, he’s a useful bench player that can help the team battle lefties in 2010 (or, I believe, he can remain in Triple-A).

Tagged with:
 

7 Responses to Get Murton

  1. Tom Gaffney says:

    Not sure if he gives you anything that Shelley Duncan doesn’t. Shelley actual out WOBA’s him this year at .397 to .388. I hear his defense is pretty bad despite average metrics.

    • Chris H. says:

      Hmm, not sure about the defense, because he’s been rated well from what I’ve seen (he seems average, if anything). Good point on Shelley. I think Murton has demonstrated that he can hit in the Majors and Shelley may be more of AAAA player, but that’s debatable. If the Yankees can have Murton and stash him in Scranton for the rest of the year, I think that’d be a nice move for next year. It really can’t hurt given the status of next year’s OF.

  2. Tom Gaffney says:

    Tough to tell much about his ability to hit major league pitching with the small sample size. Murton’s M.L. WOBA is slightly better (.345 to Shelly’s .318). Not sure why he would be DFA’d – that makes me think there must be something that doesn’t show up in the stats: terrible defense or a hole in his swing (like Shel). If he’s as good as his numbers indicate, someone will claim him before the Yanks, unfortunately.

    • Chris H. says:

      Yea, probably. I heard that he was brought up on “option waivers” which may mean that he isn’t placed on waivers when he was DFA’d. It’s a complicated situation, apparently.

  3. The other Chris H says:

    I’ve known he’s been around the league but the way he gets shipped around and never has been allowed to contribute in a starting role tells me that they all saw something in the kid preventing him from being a player that you would want. I just have a hard time seeing The A’s not playing him if he had the ability to be something.

    • Chris H. says:

      I wonder about that, too. Maybe there’s something we’re not seeing in his stats? I know his power hasn’t developed much, but beyond that he seems like a solid player.

  4. Brian says:

    I would agree with acquiring him, but we have no where to put him. I don’t think the Yankees are going to claim him just to put him in Triple-A. We already have Hinske on the bench and Gardner is about to come off of the DL.
    -
    -
    On another note, I think Girardi should play Hinske more than he is. He’s only had 46 ABs (53 PAs) since being acquired and hasn’t been that bad. I know Swisher is better, but I think he should give Eric more opportunities. It’s not like the Yankees can’t go a day or two without Swisher in the lineup.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.